Williamtfgoossen at cs.com schreef:
> In a message dated 14-3-2009 17:23:18 W. Europe Standard Time, 
> caultonpos at gmail.com writes:
>
>> How many more types of archetypes are we envisioning to support?
>
>
> I think the tools need to support ANY archetype that represents valid 
> content in health care.
An archetype editor should simply support any archetype which represents 
a valid locatable according to the reference model, plus, it must adapt 
the other archetype-rules as defined in the reference model, such as 
header requirements, etc.

Bert
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> dr. William TF Goossen
> director
> Results 4 Care b.v.
> De Stinse 15
> 3823 VM Amersfoort
> the Netherlands
> emails:
> Results4Care at cs.com
> williamtfgoossen at cs.com
> info at results4care.nl
>
> phone + 31654614458
> fax +3133 2570169
> www.results4care.nl
> Dutch Chamber of Commerce number: 32133713
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090315/f068eded/attachment.html>

Reply via email to