Williamtfgoossen at cs.com schreef: > In a message dated 14-3-2009 17:23:18 W. Europe Standard Time, > caultonpos at gmail.com writes: > >> How many more types of archetypes are we envisioning to support? > > > I think the tools need to support ANY archetype that represents valid > content in health care. An archetype editor should simply support any archetype which represents a valid locatable according to the reference model, plus, it must adapt the other archetype-rules as defined in the reference model, such as header requirements, etc. That is why I don't understand the trouble with supporting demographic archetypes, it are just locatables, with a few extra characteristics, but that is also the case for composition or other archetypes. It are all just locatables. Maybe some one can explain this.
In a few months, I will have more time, I will add the support myself, I even install Windows, if necessary. Maybe I find out by then what I have overlooked all the time. Bert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090315/254ee06d/attachment.html>
