Is much different to change the field from 'test
result:positive/negative' to 'test result positive:true/false'?
If the semantics if not the same then the 'positive/negative' has more
meaning that a simple boolean and I think they should be coded

2011/2/2 Koray Atalag <k.atalag at auckland.ac.nz>:
> Hi All, I?d like to get feedback on this issue before we move on with
> implementing.
>
>
>
> In short whether we should use DV_BOOLEAN to represent the result of a Lab
> test as Positive/Negative. This particular test can have only two values
> (well plus the null case of course). I suspect this wasn?t the purpose of
> this data type in the first place and was for really no-brainer yes/no items
> as you would expect in any computer program. But, as ever, clinical medicine
> is wicked and makes me think out of the ?usual? good practice and explore
> whether this might be an option?Perhaps this discussion will provide
> guidance for others in the community as well.
>
>
>
> Secondly (assuming that we can use DV_BOOLEAN for such cases) in GUI not all
> occurrences of Boolean will have labels as Yes/No?It can also be True/False,
> Present/Absent, Positive/Negative etc. Moreover in difference language
> translations they will surely be different. But in ADL no at code is given
> for this data type; Yes and No is written implicitly within the definition
> section. This means that we cannot set the Text in ontology section and then
> have language translations. Has anyone come across such a requirement? If so
> what?s your solution.
>
>
>
> Note that I currently model all such data items with DV_CODED_TEXT and had
> no problems. But when I wanted to render radio buttons for Yes/No type items
> instead of default combobox widget I either need a GUI directive (which we
> try to avoid if possible) or set the data type to DV_BOOLEAN so that the
> default widget would be radio button and we can use accordingly.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -koray
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>


Reply via email to