Hi Richard,
On 06/08/2018 06:07 PM, Richard Leitner wrote:
On 06/08/2018 11:02 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote:
On 2018年06月08日 15:39, Richard Leitner wrote:
Hi,
thank you for you patch!
On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote:
One recipe should only have one -dbg package, because OE only picks
up all .debug file into the last one -dbg package listed in variable
PACKAGES.
Why should one recipe, altough it conains multiple packages have only
one dbg package? Shouldn't the openjdk-8-demo-dbg package contain the
debug information for the openjdk-8-demo package?
This may be OE's policy, if one recipe contain multiple -dbg package , other
-dbg packages all will be
a empty pacakge, only have one will contain all .debug file, you can see the source
"meta/classes/package.bbclass"
But obviously the demo-dbg package isn't empty because it has its "FILES"
defined ;-)
1129 python populate_packages () {
1130 import glob, re
1156 for pkg in packages.split():
1157 if pkg in package_list:
1158 msg = "%s is listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to
packaging errors." % pkg
1159 package_qa_handle_error("packages-list", msg, d)
1160 # If debug-with-srcpkg mode is enabled then the src package will
have
1161 # priority over dbg package when assigning the files.
1162 # This allows src package to include source files and remove them
from dbg.
1163 elif split_source_package and pkg.endswith("-src"):
1164 package_list.insert(0, pkg)
1165 elif autodebug and pkg.endswith("-dbg") and not split_source_package:
<==============
1166 package_list.insert(0, pkg)
1167 else:
1168 package_list.append(pkg)
1169 d.setVar('PACKAGES', ' '.join(package_list))
1170 pkgdest = d.getVar('PKGDEST')
...
1177 debug = []
1178 for root, dirs, files in cpath.walk(dvar):
1179 dir = root[len(dvar):]
1180 if not dir:
1181 dir = os.sep
1182 for f in (files + dirs):
1183 path = "." + os.path.join(dir, f)
1184 if "/.debug/" in path or path.endswith("/.debug"):
<==============
1185 debug.append(path)
1186
Nonehteless according to my first quick test the demo-dbg package
contains lots of other debug information too...
So maybe it would be the better way to fix the content of the different
dbg packages rather than removing one?
I also thought this, but after discussing with the other guys, the result is
a recipe can only have
a -dbg package, and this is OE's policy.
Do you have a pointer to this discussion (or if it exists to the according
documentation) for us?
For oe-core's recipes, each recipe only has one dbg package, split dbg packages
doesn't make any sense since they usually can't be run independently. Please
see oe-core's commit:
commit a3b000643898d7402b9e57c02e8d10e677cc9722
Author: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@intel.com>
Date: Tue Dec 15 16:32:43 2015 +0000
meta: more removals of redunant FILES_${PN}-dbg
In some recipes overly-split -dbg packages were merged into PN-dbg. Unless
there's a very good reason, recipes should have a single -dev and -dbg
package.
// Robert
// Robert
Thanks & regards;Richard.L
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
