On 2018年06月12日 16:01, Richard Leitner wrote:
Hi Richard
Hi Wenlin,
as we clarified the "one -dbg package per recipe" thing I have some
comments on the patch itself.
On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote:
One recipe should only have one -dbg package, because OE only picks
up all .debug file into the last one -dbg package listed in variable
PACKAGES.
May you please include a reference to that statement from "Ross Burton"?
What about changing the comments as below:
openjdk-8: remove redunant FILES_${PN}-dbg
One recipe should only have one -dbg package, because OE only picks
up all .debug file into the last one -dbg package listed in variable
PACKAGES.
Comments(oe-core's commit a3b000643898d7402b9e57c02e8d10e677cc9722) from
Ross Burton as below:
"meta: more removals of redunant FILES_${PN}-dbg
In some recipes overly-split -dbg packages were merged into PN-dbg. Unless
there's a very good reason, recipes should have a single -dev and -dbg
package.
"
Signed-off-by: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.k...@windriver.com>
---
recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_16xbyy.bb | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_16xbyy.bb
b/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_16xbyy.bb
index dd0ed1d..1d7d794 100644
--- a/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_16xbyy.bb
+++ b/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_16xbyy.bb
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ do_install() {
}
PACKAGES_append = " \
- ${PN}-demo-dbg \
${PN}-demo \
${PN}-source \
"
@@ -47,12 +46,6 @@ FILES_${PN}-dbg_append = "\
${JDK_HOME}/jre/lib/${JDK_ARCH}/headless/.debug/ \
${JDK_HOME}/jre/lib/${JDK_ARCH}/xawt/.debug/ \
${JDK_HOME}/jre/lib/${JDK_ARCH}/client/.debug/ \
-"
-
-FILES_${PN}-demo = " ${JDK_HOME}/demo ${JDK_HOME}/sample "
-RDEPENDS_${PN}-demo = " ${PN} "
-
-FILES_${PN}-demo-dbg = "\
${JDK_HOME}/demo/jvmti/gctest/lib/.debug/ \
${JDK_HOME}/demo/jvmti/heapTracker/lib/.debug/ \
${JDK_HOME}/demo/jvmti/heapViewer/lib/.debug/ \
@@ -64,6 +57,9 @@ FILES_${PN}-demo-dbg = "\
${JDK_HOME}/demo/jvmti/compiledMethodLoad/lib/.debug/ \
"
AFAIK as all ".debug" are included in the -dbg packages it should
be fine if you remove the whole FILES_${PN}-dbg_append definition.
I have tested it, that's OK after remove the whole
FILES_${PN}-dbg_append definition.
Do you mean that we should also remove FILES_${PN}-dbg_append?
+FILES_${PN}-demo = " ${JDK_HOME}/demo ${JDK_HOME}/sample "
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-demo = " ${PN} "
+
FILES_${PN}-doc_append = "\
${JDK_HOME}/man \
${JDK_HOME}/ASSEMBLY_EXCEPTION \
thanks®ards;Richard.L
--
Thanks,
Wenlin Kang
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel