Hi, On 06/11/2018 08:31 AM, Robert Yang wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On 06/08/2018 06:07 PM, Richard Leitner wrote: >> On 06/08/2018 11:02 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote: >>> On 2018年06月08日 15:39, Richard Leitner wrote:
... >>>> >>>> Nonehteless according to my first quick test the demo-dbg package >>>> contains lots of other debug information too... >>>> So maybe it would be the better way to fix the content of the different >>>> dbg packages rather than removing one? >>> >>> I also thought this, but after discussing with the other guys, the result >>> is a recipe can only have >>> a -dbg package, and this is OE's policy. >> >> Do you have a pointer to this discussion (or if it exists to the according >> documentation) for us? > > For oe-core's recipes, each recipe only has one dbg package, split dbg > packages > doesn't make any sense since they usually can't be run independently. Please > see oe-core's commit: > > commit a3b000643898d7402b9e57c02e8d10e677cc9722 > Author: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@intel.com> > Date: Tue Dec 15 16:32:43 2015 +0000 > > meta: more removals of redunant FILES_${PN}-dbg > > In some recipes overly-split -dbg packages were merged into PN-dbg. > Unless > there's a very good reason, recipes should have a single -dev and -dbg > package. Ok. Thank you for that pointer. That's definitely new to me, but I'm of course fine with it! regards;Richard.L -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel