It certainly should be, but I've not had a chance to test this. The standards OpenEMed are based on include support for the old GEHR project which is now OpenEHR. I would like to see this happen, but probably don't have the time to do it myself. We have a CTS implementation called OpenCTS as part of OpenEMed that could be used in this context. All open source, of course.
Thanks, Dave Nandalal Gunaratne wrote: > > > --- David Forslund <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:forslund%40mail.com>> wrote: > I think > > EHR applications should be interoperable without > > having to use the same > > underlying code. Given some time and effort I > > would like to show that > > OpenEMed > > can accommodate the OpenEHR specifications. > > Since the archetypes are central to the OpenEHR and > these are in turn dependent on terminologies, > ontologies and vocabualries, how does OpenEMed support > this? Is the Terminology Query Service sufficient to > support these? > > _ >
