On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 07:09 +1000, Matt Connolly wrote: > On 21/06/2011, at 3:54 PM, Ken Gunderson <kgund...@teamcool.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 23:03 -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > >> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 19:58 -0700, Marion Hakanson wrote: > >>> > >>> I also happen to think "illumos" is an excellent name. Use it everywhere. > >> > >> Uhmmmm... Excuse me, but what have you been smoking? Drinking, maybe? > >> I think Illumos is a pretty lame name, nothing against the people who > >> chose it. I kind of like OpenIndiana, particularly when contracted to > >> "oi", as compared to Illumos in that at least it conveys that this is > >> supposed to be an "Open" project (although "Open" has been so misused by > >> marketroids trying to cash in on the Open Source phenom that in more > >> recent times its use has almost become a red flag, particularly > >> following the Orcale OpenSolaris fiasco). > >> > >> But all that is neither here nor there. The point is that your idea > >> was/is lame. And that your mother probably dresses you funny... > >> > >> > > > > P.S.; In the event it may have been less than obvious... above was > > intended to be taken with a sense of humor ;-P > > > > -- > > Regards-- Ken Gunderson > > Odd sense of humour, Ken... :/
Perhaps. But can we please get back to the bike shed now?? -- Regards-- Ken Gunderson _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss