I have to say that I agree with Mike that WebGL support is an absolute must especially when you consider how rudimentary the current JavaFX 3D features are.
> On 28 Jun 2015, at 04:16, Mike <mikeg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > a lot of FULL blown Webrtc support and building something in Javafx (like > Scene Builder) that Proves Webrtc support would be awesome. Ditto to Webgl > support. > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > wrote: >> Hi Felix, >> >> Sorry for the delay. Most of us were still pretty focused on 8u60, but we >> are turning our attention to JDK 9 now. >> >> The focus for JDK 9 is Jigsaw. The currently planned big features (JEPs) for >> FX in JDK 9 are these: >> >> JEP 253: Prepare JavaFX UI Controls & CSS APIs for Modularization >> JEP 257: Update JavaFX/Media to Newer Version of GStreamer >> >> Related to Jigasw, we intend to look into new API for heavily used internal >> methods / classes since they will no longer be accessible otherwise. We also >> plan to update WebKit at least one more time, and will likely do a few RFEs >> such as better Hi-DPI support (with API control) on Mac, Windows, Linux. >> >> We don't currently plan any other big features for 9, but will consider >> additional RFEs if they are important to enough developers and if they fit >> into the time frame. >> >> -- Kevin >> >> >> >> Felix Bembrick wrote: >>> Anyone got anything or is there a link somewhere that talks about these? >>> >>> On 15 June 2015 at 22:00, Felix Bembrick <felix.bembr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I realise we are a long way off JDK 9 still and with crucial features such >>>> as Jigsaw still a little up in the air but is it possible someone could >>>> itemise the most likely new features, enhancements and bug fixes that we >>>> will see in JavaFX when JDK 9 is released? >>>> >>>> Of course it's purely speculation at this point but it would assist me >>>> greatly to have some of idea of where JavaFX is heading and which areas are >>>> seen as most important. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Felix >>>> >
