<cough>JavaFX has *never* claimed to be write once, run anyway</cough>
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:13, Mike <mikeg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > <cough>write once, run anywhere</cough> > > This about sums it up! > > > >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Jack Moxley <j...@moxley.co.uk> wrote: >> >> <cough>write once, run anywhere</cough> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> On 29 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michał Zegan <webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl> >>> wrote: >>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Does it mean platform support for linux won't be implemented now, or >>> at all? >>> I usually use windows, but still depend on that support because I >>> sometimes use linux, so I am interested about that. >>> >>> W dniu 2015-06-29 o 22:40, Kevin Rushforth pisze: >>>> There is public API in 8u40 to support accessibility. Applications >>>> using standard JavaFX controls can, for example, use the >>>> accessibleText property to define the text that the screen reader >>>> will speak or the accessibleHelp property to provide a more >>>> detailed description. These properties have reasonable defaults, >>>> but can be overridden by applications. Additionally, if you use the >>>> "labelFor" property to point to a Control that the Label is >>>> associated with, the accessibility framework will use that when the >>>> screen reader is active. >>>> >>>> Custom controls can override the queryAccessibleAttribute, >>>> executeAccessibleAction, and notifyAccessibleAttributeChanged >>>> methods. >>>> >>>> As for platform support, we currently support Windows and Mac >>>> platforms. We have no plan to make FX accessible on Linux . >>>> >>>> -- Kevin >>>> >>>> >>>> Michał Zegan wrote: I saw it, and it seems promising, but: first, >>>> there is probably, or I heard it wrong? no public api for making >>>> accessibility related stuff... Also, I believe there is no linux >>>> accessibility bridge as opposed to windows and mac. And I do not >>>> know if I am wrong, or when this is going to be implemented. >>>> >>>> W dniu 2015-06-29 o 20:30, Kevin Rushforth pisze: >>>> >>>>>>> JavaFX accessibility is already implemented and was delivered >>>>>>> in JDK 8u40. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Kevin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Michał Zegan wrote: What about accessibility work? Work on it >>>>>>> has been started, but not sure if it is still targetted for >>>>>>> 9. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> W dniu 2015-06-27 o 20:16, Mike pisze: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> a lot of FULL blown Webrtc support and building >>>>>>>>>> something in Javafx (like Scene Builder) that Proves >>>>>>>>>> Webrtc support would be awesome. Ditto to Webgl >>>>>>>>>> support. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Kevin Rushforth >>>>>>>>>> <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Felix, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay. Most of us were still pretty >>>>>>>>>>> focused on 8u60, but we are turning our attention to >>>>>>>>>>> JDK 9 now. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The focus for JDK 9 is Jigsaw. The currently planned >>>>>>>>>>> big features (JEPs) for FX in JDK 9 are these: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> JEP 253: Prepare JavaFX UI Controls & CSS APIs for >>>>>>>>>>> Modularization JEP 257: Update JavaFX/Media to Newer >>>>>>>>>>> Version of GStreamer >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Related to Jigasw, we intend to look into new API for >>>>>>>>>>> heavily used internal methods / classes since they >>>>>>>>>>> will no longer be accessible otherwise. We also plan >>>>>>>>>>> to update WebKit at least one more time, and will >>>>>>>>>>> likely do a few RFEs such as better Hi-DPI support >>>>>>>>>>> (with API control) on Mac, Windows, Linux. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We don't currently plan any other big features for 9, >>>>>>>>>>> but will consider additional RFEs if they are >>>>>>>>>>> important to enough developers and if they fit into >>>>>>>>>>> the time frame. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- Kevin >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Felix Bembrick wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone got anything or is there a link somewhere >>>>>>>>>>>> that talks about these? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2015 at 22:00, Felix Bembrick >>>>>>>>>>>> <felix.bembr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I realise we are a long way off JDK 9 still and >>>>>>>>>>>>> with crucial features such as Jigsaw still a >>>>>>>>>>>>> little up in the air but is it possible someone >>>>>>>>>>>>> could itemise the most likely new features, >>>>>>>>>>>>> enhancements and bug fixes that we will see in >>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaFX when JDK 9 is released? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course it's purely speculation at this point >>>>>>>>>>>>> but it would assist me greatly to have some of >>>>>>>>>>>>> idea of where JavaFX is heading and which areas >>>>>>>>>>>>> are seen as most important. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v2 >>> >>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVka5MAAoJEHb1CzgxXKwYbKwP/RFa3NjMnXWFc6o5EzIFYlh3 >>> 5ExLUgu+IVWr1fewrf+KTcR9WmyXWN2ju8zkRb7nhjSiA+5XAf3vbvUBGTaaa1A4 >>> 92Fd0W2Mfj8M9F3Px5QP1TMS1BO7GrO12zsB+obmBvWA/xWy0GEoctja8ohT5aNf >>> hs7foi4pZRK6abMvxd94WdSNh/KhzqNvllD3tIkqlasTOOH1i7bEreQ9sxN6+DRF >>> JB87JSRuml7rYEgsOSx5Z2EE7YdgqYjdfHSAIwBvqkRDQZuOp8RrWzU6wFyyzhlm >>> RtuAQJWj1I2DNbZE9iCNJzYqajnp0OellbxGr9SrJaVPpqNjjbw6zoGZ3bhgCAow >>> BAZUlllG9UVoKcl1bHDvmB01RG2JP7RtBByS0cbqGQM0/YqtknbNWpl2r5kTVyH1 >>> EZnfkXmXYi/lqgyRBf1/WqlJnuT10ra7oAQytUajZ3cQJNbRwuFycV0yvbGo11xS >>> eaQO2ECgYyubLE8vsnw1L+2U4wLAMXY9Q3Ob1kLq12UEYB8WMoLZ+IAixUUJ6abB >>> reI+epG/Bh27R0fHChkHEgY65TIMRt8RtOXxzs+Nf0VVAC4Lj9378Y8ZEr14RbcZ >>> mO+5TvyqfDhyIP4WevGDF2/tQTvlsAzl7UuiTtD3pWZ+CpN2WeNimBHPN2ZI6lii >>> Mfj0LIA1IawOjtYjlnHz >>> =lXSV >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >>
