Maybe it should its aspirations a little higher, especially with the advent of unity, webgl or even scenegraph impls such as jmonkeyengine that do.
Sent from my iPhone > On 30 Jun 2015, at 09:42, Felix Bembrick <felix.bembr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > <cough>JavaFX has *never* claimed to be write once, run anyway</cough> > > >> On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:13, Mike <mikeg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> <cough>write once, run anywhere</cough> >> >> This about sums it up! >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Jack Moxley <j...@moxley.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>> <cough>write once, run anywhere</cough> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>>> On 29 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michał Zegan <webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> Does it mean platform support for linux won't be implemented now, or >>>> at all? >>>> I usually use windows, but still depend on that support because I >>>> sometimes use linux, so I am interested about that. >>>> >>>> W dniu 2015-06-29 o 22:40, Kevin Rushforth pisze: >>>>> There is public API in 8u40 to support accessibility. Applications >>>>> using standard JavaFX controls can, for example, use the >>>>> accessibleText property to define the text that the screen reader >>>>> will speak or the accessibleHelp property to provide a more >>>>> detailed description. These properties have reasonable defaults, >>>>> but can be overridden by applications. Additionally, if you use the >>>>> "labelFor" property to point to a Control that the Label is >>>>> associated with, the accessibility framework will use that when the >>>>> screen reader is active. >>>>> >>>>> Custom controls can override the queryAccessibleAttribute, >>>>> executeAccessibleAction, and notifyAccessibleAttributeChanged >>>>> methods. >>>>> >>>>> As for platform support, we currently support Windows and Mac >>>>> platforms. We have no plan to make FX accessible on Linux . >>>>> >>>>> -- Kevin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Michał Zegan wrote: I saw it, and it seems promising, but: first, >>>>> there is probably, or I heard it wrong? no public api for making >>>>> accessibility related stuff... Also, I believe there is no linux >>>>> accessibility bridge as opposed to windows and mac. And I do not >>>>> know if I am wrong, or when this is going to be implemented. >>>>> >>>>> W dniu 2015-06-29 o 20:30, Kevin Rushforth pisze: >>>>> >>>>>>>> JavaFX accessibility is already implemented and was delivered >>>>>>>> in JDK 8u40. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Kevin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Michał Zegan wrote: What about accessibility work? Work on it >>>>>>>> has been started, but not sure if it is still targetted for >>>>>>>> 9. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-06-27 o 20:16, Mike pisze: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> a lot of FULL blown Webrtc support and building >>>>>>>>>>> something in Javafx (like Scene Builder) that Proves >>>>>>>>>>> Webrtc support would be awesome. Ditto to Webgl >>>>>>>>>>> support. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Kevin Rushforth >>>>>>>>>>> <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Felix, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay. Most of us were still pretty >>>>>>>>>>>> focused on 8u60, but we are turning our attention to >>>>>>>>>>>> JDK 9 now. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The focus for JDK 9 is Jigsaw. The currently planned >>>>>>>>>>>> big features (JEPs) for FX in JDK 9 are these: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> JEP 253: Prepare JavaFX UI Controls & CSS APIs for >>>>>>>>>>>> Modularization JEP 257: Update JavaFX/Media to Newer >>>>>>>>>>>> Version of GStreamer >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Related to Jigasw, we intend to look into new API for >>>>>>>>>>>> heavily used internal methods / classes since they >>>>>>>>>>>> will no longer be accessible otherwise. We also plan >>>>>>>>>>>> to update WebKit at least one more time, and will >>>>>>>>>>>> likely do a few RFEs such as better Hi-DPI support >>>>>>>>>>>> (with API control) on Mac, Windows, Linux. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We don't currently plan any other big features for 9, >>>>>>>>>>>> but will consider additional RFEs if they are >>>>>>>>>>>> important to enough developers and if they fit into >>>>>>>>>>>> the time frame. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- Kevin >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Felix Bembrick wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone got anything or is there a link somewhere >>>>>>>>>>>>> that talks about these? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2015 at 22:00, Felix Bembrick >>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix.bembr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I realise we are a long way off JDK 9 still and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with crucial features such as Jigsaw still a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> little up in the air but is it possible someone >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could itemise the most likely new features, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> enhancements and bug fixes that we will see in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaFX when JDK 9 is released? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course it's purely speculation at this point >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it would assist me greatly to have some of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea of where JavaFX is heading and which areas >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are seen as most important. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> Version: GnuPG v2 >>>> >>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVka5MAAoJEHb1CzgxXKwYbKwP/RFa3NjMnXWFc6o5EzIFYlh3 >>>> 5ExLUgu+IVWr1fewrf+KTcR9WmyXWN2ju8zkRb7nhjSiA+5XAf3vbvUBGTaaa1A4 >>>> 92Fd0W2Mfj8M9F3Px5QP1TMS1BO7GrO12zsB+obmBvWA/xWy0GEoctja8ohT5aNf >>>> hs7foi4pZRK6abMvxd94WdSNh/KhzqNvllD3tIkqlasTOOH1i7bEreQ9sxN6+DRF >>>> JB87JSRuml7rYEgsOSx5Z2EE7YdgqYjdfHSAIwBvqkRDQZuOp8RrWzU6wFyyzhlm >>>> RtuAQJWj1I2DNbZE9iCNJzYqajnp0OellbxGr9SrJaVPpqNjjbw6zoGZ3bhgCAow >>>> BAZUlllG9UVoKcl1bHDvmB01RG2JP7RtBByS0cbqGQM0/YqtknbNWpl2r5kTVyH1 >>>> EZnfkXmXYi/lqgyRBf1/WqlJnuT10ra7oAQytUajZ3cQJNbRwuFycV0yvbGo11xS >>>> eaQO2ECgYyubLE8vsnw1L+2U4wLAMXY9Q3Ob1kLq12UEYB8WMoLZ+IAixUUJ6abB >>>> reI+epG/Bh27R0fHChkHEgY65TIMRt8RtOXxzs+Nf0VVAC4Lj9378Y8ZEr14RbcZ >>>> mO+5TvyqfDhyIP4WevGDF2/tQTvlsAzl7UuiTtD3pWZ+CpN2WeNimBHPN2ZI6lii >>>> Mfj0LIA1IawOjtYjlnHz >>>> =lXSV >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >>>
