To be fair Jack, WORA is/was used in reference to the Java language itself; not JavaFX.
Felix On 30 June 2015 at 17:12, Jack Moxley <j...@moxley.co.uk> wrote: > <cough>write once, run anywhere</cough> > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 29 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michał Zegan <webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl> > wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Does it mean platform support for linux won't be implemented now, or > > at all? > > I usually use windows, but still depend on that support because I > > sometimes use linux, so I am interested about that. > > > > W dniu 2015-06-29 o 22:40, Kevin Rushforth pisze: > >> There is public API in 8u40 to support accessibility. Applications > >> using standard JavaFX controls can, for example, use the > >> accessibleText property to define the text that the screen reader > >> will speak or the accessibleHelp property to provide a more > >> detailed description. These properties have reasonable defaults, > >> but can be overridden by applications. Additionally, if you use the > >> "labelFor" property to point to a Control that the Label is > >> associated with, the accessibility framework will use that when the > >> screen reader is active. > >> > >> Custom controls can override the queryAccessibleAttribute, > >> executeAccessibleAction, and notifyAccessibleAttributeChanged > >> methods. > >> > >> As for platform support, we currently support Windows and Mac > >> platforms. We have no plan to make FX accessible on Linux . > >> > >> -- Kevin > >> > >> > >> Michał Zegan wrote: I saw it, and it seems promising, but: first, > >> there is probably, or I heard it wrong? no public api for making > >> accessibility related stuff... Also, I believe there is no linux > >> accessibility bridge as opposed to windows and mac. And I do not > >> know if I am wrong, or when this is going to be implemented. > >> > >> W dniu 2015-06-29 o 20:30, Kevin Rushforth pisze: > >> > >>>>> JavaFX accessibility is already implemented and was delivered > >>>>> in JDK 8u40. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- Kevin > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Michał Zegan wrote: What about accessibility work? Work on it > >>>>> has been started, but not sure if it is still targetted for > >>>>> 9. > >>>>> > >>>>> W dniu 2015-06-27 o 20:16, Mike pisze: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> a lot of FULL blown Webrtc support and building > >>>>>>>> something in Javafx (like Scene Builder) that Proves > >>>>>>>> Webrtc support would be awesome. Ditto to Webgl > >>>>>>>> support. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Kevin Rushforth > >>>>>>>> <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Felix, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay. Most of us were still pretty > >>>>>>>>> focused on 8u60, but we are turning our attention to > >>>>>>>>> JDK 9 now. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The focus for JDK 9 is Jigsaw. The currently planned > >>>>>>>>> big features (JEPs) for FX in JDK 9 are these: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> JEP 253: Prepare JavaFX UI Controls & CSS APIs for > >>>>>>>>> Modularization JEP 257: Update JavaFX/Media to Newer > >>>>>>>>> Version of GStreamer > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Related to Jigasw, we intend to look into new API for > >>>>>>>>> heavily used internal methods / classes since they > >>>>>>>>> will no longer be accessible otherwise. We also plan > >>>>>>>>> to update WebKit at least one more time, and will > >>>>>>>>> likely do a few RFEs such as better Hi-DPI support > >>>>>>>>> (with API control) on Mac, Windows, Linux. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> We don't currently plan any other big features for 9, > >>>>>>>>> but will consider additional RFEs if they are > >>>>>>>>> important to enough developers and if they fit into > >>>>>>>>> the time frame. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- Kevin > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Felix Bembrick wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Anyone got anything or is there a link somewhere > >>>>>>>>>> that talks about these? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2015 at 22:00, Felix Bembrick > >>>>>>>>>> <felix.bembr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I realise we are a long way off JDK 9 still and > >>>>>>>>>>> with crucial features such as Jigsaw still a > >>>>>>>>>>> little up in the air but is it possible someone > >>>>>>>>>>> could itemise the most likely new features, > >>>>>>>>>>> enhancements and bug fixes that we will see in > >>>>>>>>>>> JavaFX when JDK 9 is released? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Of course it's purely speculation at this point > >>>>>>>>>>> but it would assist me greatly to have some of > >>>>>>>>>>> idea of where JavaFX is heading and which areas > >>>>>>>>>>> are seen as most important. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Felix > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v2 > > > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVka5MAAoJEHb1CzgxXKwYbKwP/RFa3NjMnXWFc6o5EzIFYlh3 > > 5ExLUgu+IVWr1fewrf+KTcR9WmyXWN2ju8zkRb7nhjSiA+5XAf3vbvUBGTaaa1A4 > > 92Fd0W2Mfj8M9F3Px5QP1TMS1BO7GrO12zsB+obmBvWA/xWy0GEoctja8ohT5aNf > > hs7foi4pZRK6abMvxd94WdSNh/KhzqNvllD3tIkqlasTOOH1i7bEreQ9sxN6+DRF > > JB87JSRuml7rYEgsOSx5Z2EE7YdgqYjdfHSAIwBvqkRDQZuOp8RrWzU6wFyyzhlm > > RtuAQJWj1I2DNbZE9iCNJzYqajnp0OellbxGr9SrJaVPpqNjjbw6zoGZ3bhgCAow > > BAZUlllG9UVoKcl1bHDvmB01RG2JP7RtBByS0cbqGQM0/YqtknbNWpl2r5kTVyH1 > > EZnfkXmXYi/lqgyRBf1/WqlJnuT10ra7oAQytUajZ3cQJNbRwuFycV0yvbGo11xS > > eaQO2ECgYyubLE8vsnw1L+2U4wLAMXY9Q3Ob1kLq12UEYB8WMoLZ+IAixUUJ6abB > > reI+epG/Bh27R0fHChkHEgY65TIMRt8RtOXxzs+Nf0VVAC4Lj9378Y8ZEr14RbcZ > > mO+5TvyqfDhyIP4WevGDF2/tQTvlsAzl7UuiTtD3pWZ+CpN2WeNimBHPN2ZI6lii > > Mfj0LIA1IawOjtYjlnHz > > =lXSV > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
