On Sat, 30 Oct 2021 09:46:13 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg <faste...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I don't see an easy way to do that, and I'm not in favor of making private >> implementation details package-public just to test some internal state. Of >> course, mnemonic support should have been designed in a way that is more >> easily testable, but this PR is not the place to do that. > > in the skin test, it could be tested indirectly, though not in isolation: > > - access the actual mnenomic via accessibleAttribute > - test whether labelFor/action is working as expected when firing an > alt-mnemonic onto the scene > > Just noticed that there is no test of TextBinding .. that's where the correct > working of the basics should be tested, shouldn't it? Just noticed @kleopatra that you suggested the same thing, I definitely agree that the place to test this is in a test for `TextBinding`. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/647
