On 03.12.2010 Thilo Goetz wrote: > Thanks, we should keep it in the backs of our > heads. Although we'd need different kinds of annotations, > we could still use the same basic data.
Hmm - I'm wondering whether why the people over on open relevance shouldn't be open to supporting your kinds of annotations? Or are they technically so different from those in the mentioned use cases (IR, Machine Learning and NLP) that it would just make not sense to explore areas for working together? Isabel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
