On 12/5/10 9:59 AM, Isabel Drost wrote:
On 03.12.2010 Thilo Goetz wrote:
Thanks, we should keep it in the backs of our
heads. Although we'd need different kinds of annotations,
we could still use the same basic data.
Hmm - I'm wondering whether why the people over on open relevance shouldn't be
open to supporting your kinds of annotations? Or are they technically so
different from those in the mentioned use cases (IR, Machine Learning and NLP)
that it would just make not sense to explore areas for working together?
I also had a few ideas how such a corpus project could be done. Maybe
we should write a proposal in the wiki, and then see how we
can collaborate with the open relevance people.
Jörn
