> There are many 16/32bit MCUs which will benefit from OpenOCD if > they are supported. Most popular non-ARM ones I can think of are Renesas > M16C/32C, H8/H8S/H8SX, Infineon XC166/XE166, TI MSP430. I have developped JTAG support for MSP430 in versaloon, as I know, JTAG chain of MSP430 isn't standard JTAG. So I don't think it possible to support MSP430 in OpenOCD.
2009-05-25 Best Regards, Simon Qian SimonQian(simonq...@simonqian.com) ---- www.SimonQian.com 发件人： Xiaofan Chen 发送时间： 2009-05-25 11:28:33 收件人： michelcatudal 抄送： openocd-development 主题： Re: [Openocd-development] support avr32 2009/5/25 Michel Catudal <michelcatu...@gmail.com>: > David Brownell a �crit : >> ? AVR32-specific support. �Probably not just the AP7 devices, >> ?�but also the UC3 flavors (since those seem to be getting >> ?�the engineering work nowadays). >> > I would agree with that. From what I have read the AVR32 is likely to > compete with NEC's V850 and Cortex devices in the next few years. ColdFire V1 and V2/V3/V4 support will be nice as well. > The devices with CAN are supposed to come out shortly. This will make > this device very important for us Engineers. > Support for OpenOCD will be very usefull. > There are many 16/32bit MCUs which will benefit from OpenOCD if they are supported. Most popular non-ARM ones I can think of are Renesas M16C/32C, H8/H8S/H8SX, Infineon XC166/XE166, TI MSP430. Just look at this chart for top 10 MCU vendors. http://www.eetasia.com/ART_8800570077_1034362_NT_9b19f76b.HTM http://www.eetasia.com/STATIC/ARTICLE_IMAGES/200904/EEOL_2009APR17_CTRLD_NT_01.gif I guess that this will take a long time. -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
