On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Sunday 24 May 2009, SimonQian wrote: >> I have developped JTAG support for MSP430 in versaloon, as I know, JTAG >> chain of MSP430 isn't standard JTAG. So I don't think it possible to support >> MSP430 in OpenOCD. > > Could you summarize how msp430 is non-standard? > > I know that msp430 -- as well as the C200 microcontrollers -- can > be programmed using an ft2232c based "XDS100" [1] adapter. Which is > certainly self-described as a JTAG adapter ... albeit one that > also controls the EMU0 and EMU1 outputs that TI likes. > > So I'd kind of thought that any differences between MSP430 and > other JTAGs are more at the level of minor goofage than anything > very significant. Like maybe problems co-existing on standard > JTAG scan chains. >
I do not know about this myself. Maybe this will help. http://xgoat.com/wp/2009/03/25/fetproxy-an-open-source-replacement-for-msp430-gdbproxy/ -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
