> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Ralf 
> S. Engelschall
> Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2007 20:04
> An: openpkg-users@openpkg.org
> Betreff: Re: Bootstrapping on Solaris
> 
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007, Birger Krägelin wrote:
> 
> > [...]
> > The problem is, that OpenPKG is not really self contained. There is 
> > still the same problem with recursive calling of "make" and "ar".
> 
> OpenPKG as a whole is not self contained with respect to this 
> issue, of course. But it would be sufficient if "make" uses 
> $(MAKE) only and "binutils" and "gcc" respect $(MAKE) and 
> $(CC) everywhere. This should be the case AFAIK and more 
> should be not required. Because once you have "make", 
> "binutils" and "gcc" you are self-hosting within the OpenPKG instance.

o.k. I admit, I do strange things.

I try to bootstrap a firewall-like hardened minimal system in an unattended 
way, and I like to bootstrap OpenPKG from source with all the latest fixes.

> > The dirty hack is to create symlinks in /bin to /openpkg/bin/ar, 
> > /openpkg/bin/gcc and /openpkg/bin/make. This way it works 
> (and you may 
> > also forget the use_xx params).
> > [...]
> 
> If you want to use symlinks place them into 
> /openpkg/lib/openpkg/fallback/. This is where those links 
> should be installed in order to not disturb the system.

That's good news. Didn't read it in the docs.

Thanks.
Birger
______________________________________________________________________
OpenPKG                                             http://openpkg.org
User Communication List                      openpkg-users@openpkg.org

Reply via email to