On 09/09/11 11:32, Viktor Tarasov wrote: > Le 09/09/2011 10:09, Martin Paljak a écrit : >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:39, Viktor >> Tarasov<viktor.tara...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Le 09/09/2011 09:23, Martin Paljak a écrit : >>>> If we omit loadable modules, we could also take that ATR tables are >>>> indeed static and do not need to be released? Is this correct? >>> Exact. >>> Only loadable module prevents the static ATR tables. >> >> Then the solution is IMHO simple. >> >> AFAIK only one proprietary (which does not work with 0.12 IIRC, the >> troubled DNIe binary module) exists in the wild at the moment and I >> don't think we should bolster piggybacking on OpenSC for this purpose. > > Fine, > and to continue this movement, could we envisage the abandon of support > of the obsolete cards ? As you are also the original code author, you should be the best to judge what is relevant and what not.
> Example, 'oberthur' driver supports the old v.2.xx of the 'AuthentIC' > PKI applet with the proprietary file system. > This card is not more produced. > The new 3.2 version of this applet, compatible with PKCS#15, is > actually supported by 'authentic' card driver. If there are cards out there and there is not much needed to maintain the current driver as a working entity, I would not rush to remove it ASAP. Maybe a forward notice would do good and the code can rotten there with the intent of being removed in X months ? Martin _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
