It depends what you mean by "this". Checking an oauth signature should not be a problem in any language. I'm sure there are oAuth libraries for java, and if not creating one would be rather simple. All it is is some url encoding and checking a private/public key signature.
On 1/31/08, Parag Dhanuka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can this be done with Java as well? I saw an OAuth java library which > seems to be doing some of what oauth.php does but still wanted to know if > this can be done or I ll have to resort to php > > On Jan 31, 2008 6:05 PM, Reinoud Elhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That is indeed how it should work, not sure whether it actually works > > that way on Orkut right now. > > > > On 1/31/08, JohnE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Then, if the viewer allowed your information to be shared (as not > > > anonymous), the restricted information as ViewerID will be sent to the > > > third party server authenticated by OAuth? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Jan 30, 10:56 pm, "Arne Roomann-Kurrik (Google)" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ViewerID is a field that will not always be available to > > > applications > > > > (we don't want to share data about the viewer with the application > > > > unless the viewer has explicitly allowed this information to be > > > > shared). Orkut is expecting a push this Friday that will implement > > > > access control lists, which should start giving users the option to > > > > share their information with the application. Once this value is > > > > shared, it can be sent back to a third party site. > > > > > > > > Hope this clears things up a bit, > > > > ~Arne > > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 5:07 pm, JohnE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > Sounds good! =) > > > > > > > > > But, about the others essential data as viewerID? It will be > > > > > authenticated by OAuth asopensocial_owneridcurrently? > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 4:28 pm, "Arne Roomann-Kurrik (Google)" > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi John, > > > > > > > > > > We know that the IDs currently don't match what you would get > > > with a > > > > > > Person.getId() call. I've filed a bug with the engineers to get > > > this > > > > > > issue resolved. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > ~Arne > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 29, 3:37 pm, JohnE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, works fine now. But I think that lack on authentication > > > some > > > > > > > essential data for the development on third part servers (as > > > viewer > > > > > > > ID,opensocial_owneridas same of opensocial.Person.getId()). > > > > > > > > > > > Any idea about it? > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 29, 5:56 pm, pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > It works now: > > > > > > > > > > > > "Success! The data was validated" > > > > > > > > > > > > Tks Arne! > > > > > > > > Pacheco > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 28, 10:08 pm, "Arne Roomann-Kurrik (Google)" > > > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since that page was posted a change was checked into > > > theOAuth > > > > > > > > > library that breaks signing requests. For more > > > information, a bug has > > > > > > > > > been filed here: > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://code.google.com/p/oauth/issues/detail?id=7 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Until the patch is committed to the project, you can > > > try this fix: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Change the line inOAuth.php that reads: > > > > > > > > > if( $parts['port'] != '80' ){ > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > if( isset($parts['port']) && $parts['port'] != '80' ){ > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if that resolves the problem. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > ~Arne > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 28, 10:28 am, pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lane / Arne, not working for me either: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "This request was spoofed" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyways, tks for the explanation... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did anyone found a way to implement it successfully? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > > > > > Pacheco > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 24, 11:12 pm, Lane LiaBraaten < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Arne put together a page with information on how to > > > use the > > > > > > > > > > > makeRequest method to send signed requests to your > > > server. His > > > > > > > > > > > examples include both client-side gadget code and some > > > PHP code that > > > > > > > > > > > runs on the server to validate the request. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check it out here: > > > http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial/web/validating-signed-reque. > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > Lane > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Parag Dhanuka > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Orkut Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to opensocial-orkut@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-orkut?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
