Shawn Walker writes: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > As for me, I'd agree with phase 2, if phase 2 provides near-enough > > approximation of functionality that users are unlikely to notice the > > difference. But phase 1 seems more and more like a terrible idea. > > Phase 1 solves the problem of "I type top and nothing happens." > > In my view, having something is better than nothing if that something > doesn't look like "top" yet. As the case materials pointed out, top > varies from distribution to distribution.
Simply integrating the existing 'top' utility would also fix that problem, and would do it without creating a bait-n-switch problem. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
