Daniel Hain wrote: > I've been informed that the project team has an Aug 6 deadline for > providing EOF materials to Marketing and Docs, pending resolution of > this case (timeout on 8/4). I would like to summarize where I think we > are so that the project team can address any issues between now and when > the case times out. > > Issue: Client side caching in our NFSv4: how this gap will be filled, > or why it isn't necessary. There has been some discussion about > migrating to NFSv4+ZFS, but it was unclear as to whether that was > sufficient. > > Issue: Provide a local persistent cache feature, or commitment to do > so. Some good discussion of why such a feature would be nice, but it > was not clear if this was a requirement for moving forward with the EOF.
I think this case needs a formal opinion. I'm derailing it an will happily provide the opinion text (as either majority or minority). Do other ARC members wish to vote now or when they see a draft opinion ? -- Darren J Moffat
