Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> I never said that I believed that they didn't. But it was the
> presumption of the earlier mail from someone else (Joe?) that I was
> commenting on.
That was me, prompted by the /usr/gnu/bin:/usr/bin observation about
Indiana (from Alan?).
I **strongly** believe that some things need to be reviewed pre-Preview
and this is one of them. We all know that Previews (incl. Solaris
Express) have some funny guarantees. We've had this discussion in the
Solaris Express context a couple of times already.
Let's just forget the rules, and play what if...
Indiana ships with the alternate gnu personality by default.
PSARC/whoever says "NO".
Somebody (perhaps Indiana users? perhaps other users? perhaps ???) will
be very unhappy. Expectations are being set.
This class of expectations is the "train wreck" I was referring to - not
a general Indiana vs process issue.
- jek3
