On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
> ...
> My knowledge of PA-RISC assembler is rather limited, but if I
> compare pa-risc.s and pa-risc2.s, I see that reference to "Division
> would overflow" is treated completely different. And I can actually
> imagine that the way it's treated in pa-risc2.s is not
> positon-independent... Given that that code is actually never called
> (it's an assertion mostly for debugging purposes) it's perfectly
> possible to get rid of at least call to fprintf. In other words try
> following patch. Note that I can't actually verify it, so that if it
> doesn't work, you're expected to make an effort to make it work:-)
> Most notably I might have deleted two much at the end...
with your patch applied shared library linkage and tests succeed on
hpux-parisc2-cc target.
best regards,
--
aspa http://www.kronodoc.fi/
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
