On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 10:35:16PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> The "2" is just sort of a counter which is needed to allow more than
> [...]
Hi, I have chosen another packaging method:
Version 0.9.6h will consist only of the needed DLLs to link applications
build against it.
The package will be called
openssl096-0.9.6h-1.tar.bz2
The new 0.9.7 version will become the openssl package again, as the
0.9.6 version before. So the new packages are still just called
"openssl":
openssl-0.9.7-1.tar.bz2
openssl-devel-0.9.7-1.tar.bz2
openssl-0.9.7-1-src.tar.bz2
That means, the patch to util/cygwin.sh can be reverted to create
the normal openssh packages again instead of openssh2.
Is that ok with you? Would you revert the cygwin.sh patch then?
Thanks in advance,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
