> > > I tried this patch on DJGPP both as normally compiled and also using
> > > the asm modules (put ${x86_out_asm} in the DJGPP config-string
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^ Oh! I missed that. I mean the fact that they are not
> > actually engaged in the default configuration. Any particular reason
> > why?
>
> The only reason is to maintain 386 compatibility. The last time I
> asked (I think it was about a year ago), there was a question as to
> whether 386 incompatible instructions were used in the asm files, even
> if "386" was specified in the Configure options.
If you './Configure ... DJGPP 386', then pure 386 asm code will be
generated. Well, it's all about single instruction, bswapl to be
specific... A.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
