From: Arpadffy Zoltan <[email protected]>
> I am sorry, I could not test your changes yet - I'll do it, hopefully, duri=
> ng this week.
> ...but to be honest, I am more curious what is Richard's opinion about your=
> changes.
I'm curious about anyone's opinion, but you know as much as I do.
Please let me know if you see any problems. (By the way, did you have
any actual need for the 64-bit-pointer stuff, or was that work done
mostly for fun?)
Today's change set includes different names for the various
"[...]install.com" procedures, and better clean-up of the logical names
which each one defines.
http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s2d.zip
Ideally, with these changes, no one should find any WRK_* logical names
left defined after running any of these procedures. Also, with the new,
unique procedure names, the (new) "@@@ whatever.com" messages should
provide some useful information. I think that I've exhausted my to-do
list, so, unless I find some new problems, I may be quiet for a while.
My VAX is still working on a Perl build (which I was hoping to use
for OpenSSL testing), so I still haven't tried the latest version of
everything there. (But what could go wrong?)
I tried building the original and modified 1.0.0d code on an HP-UX
(11.31 ia64) system, and I didn't see any significant differences in the
test results. So, either those command-line argc+argv changes were all
good, or else the tests are insufficient to show the new problems.
Complaints are always welcome, of course.
SMS.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [email protected]
