On 03/19/2013 10:47 AM, Pierre DELAAGE wrote:
> Dear Steve, I was wondering whether the wiki could be "fed" at the 
> beginning by all the Documents available at 
> "http://www.openssl.org/docs/";.
> 
> Very often people are able to comment, eg, a command page with some 
> samples or error comments, instead of rewriting from scratch a "man 
> page".
> 
> And this could be a way to only have one unique set of docs to 
> maintain, and to refer to, instead of having two...

That's an interesting suggestion; I'll kick it around and see what kind
of traction it gets.

> ...
> 
> Moreover, for the lib, I suggest to separate the "reference manual",
>  describing and commenting each api call, from a kind of
> "programmers' manual", that could describe how to use the lib for
> various purposes: such manuals were available for various programming
> tools in the past, and I have always been happy with those 2
> complementary set of docs.
> 
> 
> For the command line set, and general config/install of the tool I 
> suggest to do the same : - reference doc of each command and conf 
> file - advanced users' manual covering install/config/and usage for 
> various purposes.
> 
> For example : I am using the command line tools as a very basic pki 
> system to create certificate for my company. Those certs are
> produced by openssl to be used by openssl based applications such as
> stunnel or Apache: those usage are very common and should be
> documented in an advanced users manual. Sometime those certs have to
> be imported in client apps such as Mozilla Firefox or Thunderbird, or
> M$ Ie and outllook : I think the wiki/adv users manual could be a
> good repository for all this.
> 
> And of course, although openssl is for advanced users, I think some 
> pedagogic material on cryptography and its usage, and the benefit of
>  using openssl to fulfill those needs, could be very useful.

So you're suggest three major divisions: reference, programming, and
didactic. Also an interesting suggestion.

> 
> Well, in fact I am wondering about the best way to structure the 
> chapters of the wiki : depending on that, we can hope to have 
> something as clear and useful as possible, instead of being a bazaar 
> of various things.

I think that is the major part of the challenge: organization. On the
other hand useful material can always be organized later.

> Personnally I can contribute to some command line tools usage case, 
> although I have to admit that I feel a little bit intimidated to 
> publish something on this prestigious wiki...
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now that made me laugh :-)

You're already contributed something with your thoughtful comments,
don't stop now.

-Steve M.

-- 
Steve Marquess
OpenSSL Software Foundation, Inc.
1829 Mount Ephraim Road
Adamstown, MD  21710
USA
+1 877 673 6775 s/b
+1 301 874 2571 direct
marqu...@opensslfoundation.com
marqu...@openssl.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to