On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:18:59PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 20/10/17 20:20, Tony Breeds wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > With the election behind us it's somewhat traditional to look at > > some simple stats from the elections: > > > > +----------+-----------------------+-------------------+-----------------------+ > > | Election | Electorate (delta %) | Voted (delta %) | Turnout % (delta > > %) | > > +----------+-----------------------+-------------------+-----------------------+ > > | 10/2013 | 1106 ( nan) | 342 ( nan) | 30.92 ( > > nan) | > > | 04/2014 | 1510 ( 36.53) | 448 ( 30.99) | 29.67 ( > > -4.05) | > > | 10/2014 | 1893 ( 25.36) | 506 ( 12.95) | 26.73 ( > > -9.91) | > > | 04/2015 | 2169 ( 14.58) | 548 ( 8.30) | 25.27 ( > > -5.48) | > > | 10/2015 | 2759 ( 27.20) | 619 ( 12.96) | 22.44 ( > > -11.20) | > > | 04/2016 | 3284 ( 19.03) | 652 ( 5.33) | 19.85 ( > > -11.51) | > > | 10/2016 | 3517 ( 7.10) | 801 ( 22.85) | 22.78 ( > > 14.71) | > > | 04/2017 | 3191 ( -9.27) | 427 ( -46.69) | 13.38 ( > > -41.25) | > > | 10/2017 | 2430 ( -23.85) | 420 ( -1.64) | 17.28 ( > > 29.16) | > > +----------+-----------------------+-------------------+-----------------------+ > > > > Election CIVS links > > 10/2014: > > http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_c105db929e6c11f4 > > 04/2015: > > http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_ef1379fee7b94688 > > 10/2015: > > http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_4ef58718618691a0 > > 04/2016: > > http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_fef5cc22eb3dc27a > > 10/2016: > > http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_356e6c1b16904010 > > 04/2017: > > http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_072c4cd7ff0673b5 > > 10/2017: > > http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_ce86063991ef8aae > > > > I don't have a feel for with the Pike electorate decreased but my gut > > feel is that it was organic drop-off possibly in part to the shorter > > Ocata development cycle. The Queens drop-off was due to a new[1] > > membership API being available that meant we could validate Foundation > > membership instead of using gerrit permission as a proxy. > > Can we maybe calculate the electorate size using the old method as well so > that we can quantify how much of the dropoff (in theory it could be more > than 100%) was due to the change in effective eligibility criteria vs. > organic change in the number of contributors?
You can insert this line into the table above to replace the official 10/2017 election. | 10/2017 | 2696 ( -15.51) | 420 ( -1.64) | 15.58 ( 16.42) | So ~10% of all change owners were excluded due to not being Foundation members. Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
