On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 09:48:06PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-10-25 12:18:59 -0400 (-0400), Zane Bitter wrote: > [...] > > Can we maybe calculate the electorate size using the old method as well so > > that we can quantify how much of the dropoff (in theory it could be more > > than 100%) was due to the change in effective eligibility criteria vs. > > organic change in the number of contributors? > [...] > > I did a baseline comparison of the old and new methods as they were > developed, and as of a few days before the most recent PTL elections > the percentage of "old" TC electorate who lacked discoverable > foundation member profiles (either because of no matching E-mail > addresses or lapsed membership due to a failure to vote in board > elections) was right at 10%. It's likely to have diverged a little since > that time (my guess is that it won't have moved much), but the > election officials _should_ be able to produce this number trivially > since the structured data output by the validation script includes > all contributors and merely flags the "member" contributors eligible > to vote by including their discovered OpenStack Foundation > Individual Member Id numbers.
Yup :) for the record I replied to Zane before reading you email ... glad they agree :) Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
