-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Robert Schiele wrote: >> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:08:24PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >>> I know that. But for the initial download, a bzip2 compressed file >>> is likely to be much smaller than a gzip compressed file. >> About 30% on that type of file. Do you think this is worth the effort to >> accept having redundant data in the repository with an additional risk of >> inconsistencies? > > Yes. Because if it is done right, no inconsistencies can happen.
No need of pursuing down that path anyway, mandating rsync on mirror servers is a blocker ;) cheers - -- -o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/ /\\ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEfMZ2r3NMWliFcXcRAqpkAJwPGjVmjxUAZzLMrCpZPKfrPJXryACfdIgo /RRvPB5uRxyc7IqYw5vNdt8= =Uj0I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
