On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 19:25 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote: > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:26 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 01:53 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 14:59 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 12:48 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote:
> > > > > Me too. I use Google Desktop Search because it is more mature tool and > > > > > consumes less CPU power. > > > > Its also indexes far less last time I checked. > > > That's nice to hear, thanks! I'll test it on Factory over the weekend. > > I suspect that what JP is saying, is that it indexes far fewer file > > formats, not that its indexer runs faster. At least, that's how I read > > it. It looks like you read it differently, since your reply is so > > positive :) > Yep, I've read it differently :( > > BTW I've noticed that it indexes fewer file formats than GDS (which is > one of the reasons why I use GDS), but I'll test it on Factory anyway. > On my openSUSE 10.3 I'll keep using GDS for now. Ok, but I think he meant that GDS indexes fewer file formats than Beagle :) -- Hans Petter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
