Hello, on Donnerstag, 30. September 2010, Frank Sundermeyer wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:54:30 +0200 Jos Poortvliet wrote: > > That is actually a pretty good point. If our Wiki is good enough in > > terms of content, we can try and figure out how to automate > > creating a book.
> I completely disagree. You are proposing to create documentation in a > completely unstructured format and then writing parsers attempting to > create an exchangeable format. See my mail some minutes ago - I think it is possible and not too hard. > It is re-inventing the wheel by starting with a rectangle. Well, a pair of angle brackets in XML already looks like a rectangle - and not really like a circle *SCNR* [1] > We already have all the style-sheets for XML to provide the formats > we need (including wiki text). The problem is not "wiki text output" - that's easy. The problem is "merge changes in the wiki back". Regards, Christian Boltz [1] this side blow already was worth the mail *eg* -- [Evolution - Message-ID] Oh ja... Apropos: die libcamel (die fuer diesen Muell verantwortlich ist) ist, aehm. "interessant" zu lesen... Und NEIN! Ich habe keine Lust, den Muell zu fixen. Es sei denn, man zahlt mir Schmerzensgeld. [David Haller in suse-linux] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-marketing+unsubscr...@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-marketing+h...@opensuse.org
