On Monday 07 January 2008 05:56, Mike McMullin wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 09:52 +0100, jdd wrote: > > >> Besides, the > > >> subject says OT, so a reasonably decent filter should flush > > >> any OT message for those who detest OT posts. > > After they get dl'ed from the host, and some people getting the list > are on dial up where time is money, so it's also being considerate to > keep the OT chatter to a minimum. > > > couldn't [OT] subject be filtered out to OT list?? > > > > jdd > > They should actually get put there as the intent of the OT list was a > place to put OT things.
I would love to see a show of hands (here) as to how many read the OT list. I certainly don't, and I would bet that 95% of the rest of you don't either. --doug Blessed are the peacemakers ... for they shall be shot at from both sides. --A.M. Greeley -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
