On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 20:43 -0500, Doug McGarrett wrote: > On Monday 07 January 2008 05:56, Mike McMullin wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 09:52 +0100, jdd wrote: > > > >> Besides, the > > > >> subject says OT, so a reasonably decent filter should flush > > > >> any OT message for those who detest OT posts. > > > > After they get dl'ed from the host, and some people getting the list > > are on dial up where time is money, so it's also being considerate to > > keep the OT chatter to a minimum. > > > > > couldn't [OT] subject be filtered out to OT list?? > > > > > > jdd > > > > They should actually get put there as the intent of the OT list was a > > place to put OT things. > > I would love to see a show of hands (here) as to how many read the OT list. > I certainly don't, and I would bet that 95% of the rest of you don't either.
I am subscribed, but the thing is there are a number of folks lurking, and just reading. Only Henne could give an accurate number of how many are subscribed to both lists. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
