Re: [OS-webwork] Documentation

[Hani Suleiman]

Exactly. This documentation thread has gone on long enough, overall consensus seems to be a yes to xdocs, and an no to maven. The very fact that the 'simple mavenising' posted on here says that one has to get maven out of cvs is a winning argument against using it ;)

On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 05:42 PM, Patrick Lightbody wrote:

bit.  I liked the xdoc format, however and was planning on using that
regardless.

Ken,
Not sure if we are going to use Maven (Mike likes it, Rickard doesn't, I
sorta-like-it-sorta-hate-it). I'm sure everyone else out there falls
somewhere in one of those three categories. BUT, since you're going to use
xdoc no matter what, I think the green light has turned on, documentation
can begin :)

-Pat



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork