> > Would you mind sharing what you needed to do? > Nothing special. I repeated the steps I did before the "problematic" pull that added opm-parser as a requirement. The steps are a little convoluted because I amended the cluster for newer toolchain.
I would like however to ask if any effort is being put on the development of an open format for grid/property/well description rather than growing on top of the Eclipse format. I personally find open source software with only proprietary file formats a bit contradictory. I am probably misunderstanding something. I know many people use Eclipse and that you're very much interested in it. However, in my humble opinion, it shouldn't be the center of attention in OPM initiative. Sincerely, Júlio.
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
