> > I agree. However, we need to relate to reality. Reality is that we would > need to replace a vast value chain of software to support a custom format. > It would render opm useless for industry, failing a key design goal for opm. >
Does OPM target industry prior to academia? Could you please elaborate on that? To my reality (academia) having an entirely open software/specification ecosystem is extremely important. It's in fact the only possible way to make our work reproducible by other researchers and interested people [1<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility> ,2 <http://reproducibleresearch.net/index.php/Main_Page>]. > A part from the ideology, how would another format hell you? > A format would help describe complex reservoirs with pure OPM code without the need for external (proprietary) tools. Going back to that new dependency opm-core <- opm-parser... It's the first time I see *-core depend on something else. As a developer I would expect the core of anything to be self-sufficient. Júlio.
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
