Jean, I think “model (Section 2 of [RFC8309]) or the network model (Section 2.1 of [RFC8309])” should be “model (Section 2 of [RFC8309]) or the network model (Section 2.1 of [RFC8969])
Cheers, Med De : OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> De la part de Jean Quilbeuf Envoyé : mardi 28 juin 2022 13:18 À : Wubo (lana) <lana.wubo=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org>; Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org>; opsawg@ietf.org Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03 Hi Bo, Thanks a lot for your comments. I addressed them in the current version: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-06. For point 1: clarified that service is linked to what the service orchestrator is orchestrating. I hope that this solves the issue? For point 2: clarified that metric engine is part of the SAIN agent. Best, Jean From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wubo (lana) Sent: Friday 24 June 2022 11:48 To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:zhoutianran=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org>>; opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03 Hi all, I have read rev-05 of the draft and I think this document is ready to progress. The draft defines a flexible service assurance architecture and provides some concrete examples to illustrate how to use it. Just a few suggestions to improve readability: 1 The definition of ‘service’ seems not clear to me, e.g. Introduction refers the service module definition in RFC 8199, but Section 3.7<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture#section-3.7>. Flexible Functional Architecture says the definition of service is very generic, and this is true that in the example the IS-IS, device and interface could also be service. I noticed Med also raised some questions on this. I hope this has been solved. 2 ’metric engine’ is defined in Terminology. It is not clear to me where is this function belonged to, is it part of SAIN agent? Thanks, Bo From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 6:00 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03 Hi WG, This mail we start a two weeks working group last call for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture/ Please send over your comments before June 22. Please also indicate if you think this document is ready to progress. Cheers, Tianran, on behalf of chairs _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
