Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

[mohamed . boucadair]

Hi all, 

This is really useful work. I support adoption. 

Some coordination with other WGs will be needed, but I'm confident 
Carlos/Adrian will drive that through.

I have comments about some of the proposed terms: consider path coupled/path 
decoupled OAM instead of path path-congruent terms + “User Data Embedded OAM” 
or “OAM-embedded User Data” instead of the ambiguous “in-packet OAM”. 

I trust that discussion to continue when (hopefully) the doc is adopted.

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> De la part de Henk Birkholz
> Envoyé : mercredi 10 avril 2024 13:06
> À : OPSAWG <opsawg@ietf.org>
> Objet : [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-
> whaaat-question-mark-03
> 
> 
> Dear OPSAWG members,
> 
> this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of
> 
> >
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > ietf.org%2Farchive%2Fid%2Fdraft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-
> question-m
> > ark-
> 03.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C443f572f51
> >
> af4bee4cbd08dc594e2f2f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C63
> >
> 8483439534955276%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV
> >
> 2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WsZJskcEImRAO
> > mAS9feqGgSEAPV4R0Cz%2F5aPbpF1kOI%3D&reserved=0
> 
> ending on Thursday, May 2nd.
> 
> As a reminder, this I-D summarizes how the term "Operations,
> Administration, and Maintenance" (OAM) is used currently &
> historically in the IETF and intends to consolidate unambiguous and
> protocol agnostic terminology for OAM. The summary includes
> descriptions of narrower semantics introduced by added qualifications
> the term OAM and a list of common capabilities that can be found in
> nodes processing OAM packets.
> 
> The chairs acknowledge a positive poll result at IETF119, but there
> has not been much discussion on the list yet. We would like to gather
> feedback from the WG if there is interest to further contribute and
> review. As a potential enabler for discussions, this call will last
> three weeks.
> 
> Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments
> you may have.
> 
> 
> For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
> 
> Henk
> 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg