Hi Michael, thank you for the update. I'm glad that you found the definition in RFC 9551 working for ANIMA's Autonomic Control Plane as well. I will read RFC 8994 to educate myself about it.
Regards, Greg On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:54β―PM Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have to repeat that the definitions of terms "in-band OAM", > "out-of-band > > OAM", and "on-path telemetry" > > > In-band OAM: an active OAM method that is in band within the > > monitored DetNet OAM domain when it traverses the same set of > > links and interfaces receiving the same QoS and Packet > > Replication, Elimination, and Ordering Functions (PREOF) treatment > > as the monitored DetNet flow. > > > Out-of-band OAM: an active OAM method whose path through the DetNet > > domain may not be topologically identical to the path of the > > monitored DetNet flow, its test packets may receive different QoS > > and/or PREOF treatment, or both. > > On the topic of RFC8994's overlay management network, which we described as > virtual out-of-band. It would seem to fit into the above definition, since > the overlay packets might go another route, and might get a different QoS > treatment. > > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
