just did a test and it seemed to make a big difference. In IE advanced
options I had Use HTTP1.1 turned off. I turned it back on and it made a big
difference. As a matter of fact, I don't see the problem anymore as of yet.
(after clearing cache).
Dale
----- Original Message -----
From: Christof Baumgaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: Performance for static files
> Looks to me like if Orionserver tries to do HTTP/1.1 Keep-Alive without
setting
> the Content-length accordingly. Can anybody confirm?
>
> Dale Bronk wrote:
>
> > Right now until I am proved otherwise, I disagree. I posted a message a
day
> > or so ago and have no reply yet. Now I do believe that it is probably
some
> > setting I have (although I am using the default settings from Orion),
but my
> > web pages are not served very fast at all. I am on a PIII 256M using
> > Windows Server 2000 and tested the same static pages with Apache and IIS
and
> > they really popup quickly. With Orion, the pages seem to completely
display
> > but the browser keeps going for up to 10-15 seconds before it stops.
> >
> > I am not saying I disagree with the benchmarks, what I am saying is I
agree
> > with them with the correct set of configurations as I have used the same
> > static pages on the same machine with Apache, IIS, and Orion. I did not
use
> > any benchmarking tools other than my eye but it was very obvious
(clearing
> > browser cache between each request) that as soon as the pages "appeared"
to
> > be fully display (very small graphics, if any) using Apache and IIS, the
> > browser (both IE and NS) stopped. With Orion, the browsers just kept
going
> > (not sure doing what) for another 10-15 seconds.
> >
> > Like I said, I am sure it is some configuration but I wish someone would
> > tell me what the setting is. I also tried browsing from several
different
> > machines to make sure that it was not simply my browser.
> >
> > Dale
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:51 AM
> > Subject: SV: Performance for static files
> >
> > > Look at the benchmark page...
> > >
> > > Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into
the
> > > bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun...
> > >
> > > Klaus Myrseth
> > >
> > > -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> > > Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40
> > > Til: Orion-Interest
> > > Emne: Performance for static files
> > >
> > >
> > > We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its
> > > dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF,
> > > JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based
> > > applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the
> > > file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL
> > > Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Christof
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
