Tim, thankyou for your mature and decent reply - it is very much
appreciated.

I must apologise for being rather obtrusive, I am almost ready to crack and
'let them take me away', and everyone seems to be taking a fair whack from
it just recently.  Some people react like bulldogs, and some people care to
remember they are dealing with real people with real problems.

Sorry if I caused you any displeasure.

Cliff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Endres
> Sent: 15 February 2001 03:22
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Re: Last posting
>
>
> Cliff,
>
> I think your posting was sufficiently complex and general that it was
> unlikely to generate a reponse. Speaking for myself, but suspecting
> that it applies to other "professionals", I am very busy, and do not
> have the time to devote to such a response. Sorry.
>
> However, I believe you would be more likely to get a reply if you try
> asking specific questions.
>
> tim.
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Pardon me if I sound a little rude, but since not a single person has
> > even acknowledged my last post, do I assume that (a) noone cares or
> > (b) noone knows?  I am very keen to get started, and very keen to
> > evaluate the various avenues open to us, and I had expected a
> > commercial application to have a reasonably professional following.
> > Perhaps I was mistaken and I should look elsewhere?
> >
> > Cliff Rowley
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
> >
> > iQA/AwUBOosbgApjs58+bOhlEQKwigCgnaxMsVQAHoiFpkfbNk48fqTDWXsAoMNy
> > HxbYNGGXjPNB/neGWBPbq8yf
> > =RK40
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to