...except the wait is due to an internal refactoring that should yield significant benefits. Yourconclusion was predicted by the list in general, but I disagree; the team's still working on Orion, and I figure that people will be more happy once the new versions come out. You'd hope it would be incremental changes as it was in the past (anyone remember the three-versions-a-day times?) but that's simply not realistic considering the changes being put into place. Patience. Enjoy.
--------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Jarrod Roberson wrote: > At 03:41 PM 4/11/2002, you wrote: > >Whats the current state of Ironflare and Orion? > > > >Nothing has changed in the 'stable release' of Orion for almost a year, even > >though there are glaring bugs in http session clustering (not even fixed in > >1.5.4) and some significantly lacking components. Ironflare was supposed > >to be in the pavillion at JavaONE, but oddly they had no write up > >(apparently they didn't submit one), and didn't actually show up (so their > >booth was empty). There also seems to be a conspicuous infrequency to their > >responses here. > > > >I know that Oracle 9iAS is evolving and expanding, and I believe that > >IronFlare is doing a significant amount of work on the 9iAS code base (as > >consultants?). But whats to become of Orion? It almost appears that Oracel > >has consumed Orion completely and no development will happen on the old > >Orion. > > looks like someone finally figured it out! > > this is what happens when you get one big "customer" with a guaranteed > revenue stream, can't much blame them myself. > > > >
