Hey guys: I have seen this problem before - it only happens if you run the start_over script and then re-run the OSCAR installation process. As far as I could tell, it doesn't cause any problem.
Cheers, Bernard > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Lombard, David N > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:10 > To: Mark Hamrick; [email protected]; Benoit > des Ligneris > Subject: RE: [Oscar-users] FC2, Step 4 install Failure. > > From: Mark Hamrick; Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:01 AM > > > >Hello everyone, > > > >I went back, did a complete reinstall of FC2 again, with the > workstation > >option set. I got through most of it fine, until I got to Step 4 > >again. This time, when I started OSCAR, I noticed a new warning: > > > > > >patching file /usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/Tk/Image.pm > >Patching systeminstaller so that it support fedora Applying patch > /opt/oscar/packages/sis/scripts/fedora.patch/distinfo.patch > >patching file usr/share/systeminstaller/distinfo/Fedora/stages > >Applying patch > /opt/oscar/packages/sis/scripts/fedora.patch/Image.pm.patch > >patching file usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/Image.pm > >Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1. > >Hunk #2 FAILED at 19. > >Hunk #3 FAILED at 31. > >2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > >usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/Image.pm.rej > >SIS patch for fedora done > >--> Successfully ran server > > In theory, this can't happen, but there's nothing so > practical as a good theory, is there? > > At any rate, the problem occurred when an OSCAR-provided > Fedora-specific patch was applied to a file from the > systeminstaller-x11 rpm. What's confusing here is that your > log shows this rpm was, in fact, installed by OSCAR -- so, > the patch should match the target. > > I would not be surprised to see an error such as this if you > had a different version of the systeminstaller-x11 rpm, but > that doesn't appear to be the case. > > Would you post the .rej file? > > Benoit, this is your patch, do you have any comments? > > -- > David N. Lombard > > My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & > candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=ick > _______________________________________________ > Oscar-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users > ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Oscar-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
