Thanks for the feedback. I am glad that the compiler will work easier than the player. Ubuntu indeed uses the nspluginwrapper and I previously had the flash9 player working, however by following the first part of the SDK installation instructions (uninstall falsh player plugin and replace it with the debugger version distributed as part of the SDK) I have managed to break it.
However, the stand-alone-player (i.e. not the browser-plugin) distributed with the SDK runs fine. So is it really necessary to have the browser-plugin-player be the debugger version? Does the rest of the SDK depend on this? Or could I use the stand-alone-player for debugging and stick with the standard player? Izak ----- Original Message ---- From: Dan Shryock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Open Source Flash Mailing List <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2008 12:38:09 AM Subject: Re: [osflash] Am I overlooking any crucial tools? > humm should he not be able to run a 32bit flash player on the 64bit machine ? > the same as you would run the 32bit flash player within a 32bit browser That is correct (I'm running the flashplayer on a 64bit opensuse install myself). I wasn't intending it to sound as if you can't run the flash player, just that it can be trickier than running the sdk because not all distros make it easy to use (either by bundling a 32bit browser instead of a 64bit browser, or by including a 64bit browser and nspluginwrapper). Sorry for the confusion. Dan _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
