Hi everyone,
Well after fresh install and a reboot my flash player works again. I´ve
replaced /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so with the debugger
libflashplayer.so from the SDK and it still works. I can also run swf's in the
standalone player. I've started compiling actionscript tutorials using mxmlc.
However I can't get trace() to work (in either the plugin or the standalone).
Trace instructions are simply ignored. I've even tried running the compiler
with the debug=true flag, but as expected that does not influcence trace().
What could I be doing wrong?
Here is a minimal example (contents of file HelloWorld.as:
package {
import flash.display.Sprite;
import flash.text.TextField;
public class HelloWorld extends Sprite {
public function HelloWorld() {
var display_txt:TextField = new TextField();
display_txt.text = "Hello World!";
//displays text
trace("attempting to trace something else")
//does nothing
addChild(display_txt);
}
}
}
The compiler is invoked:
mxmlc -benchmark=true HelloWorld.as
regards,
Izak
----- Original Message ----
From: Martin Wood-Mitrovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Open Source Flash Mailing List <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2008 9:29:49 AM
Subject: Re: [osflash] Am I overlooking any crucial tools?
izak marais wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I am glad that the compiler will work easier
> than the player. Ubuntu indeed uses the nspluginwrapper and I previously
> had the flash9 player working, however by following the first part of
> the SDK installation instructions (uninstall falsh player plugin and
> replace it with the debugger version distributed as part of the SDK) I
> have managed to break it.
>
> However, the stand-alone-player (i.e. not the browser-plugin)
> distributed with the SDK runs fine. So is it really necessary to have
> the browser-plugin-player be the debugger version? Does the rest of the
> SDK depend on this? Or could I use the stand-alone-player for debugging
> and stick with the standard player?
just use the standalone.
actually thats one thing that bothers me about FlexBuilder is that it defaults
to generating html wrappers and launching them in the browser without any
preferences to change it for new projects.
what i find strange is that they could have easily integrated the player into
an
eclipse view either via some JNI stuff to directly host the plugin or via the
browser component, after all Adobe should know their own technology....anyway,
im rambling about FlexBuilder which isn't free or open source so not really
appropriate :)
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
