Hi David, Thanks for the info. And yes, you're right about implementing features in PAL.
About the integration of audio and physics, we aim at giving users an easier access to features often coupled with scene graphs. Doesn't it make sense for you? Or maybe we're not talking about the same thing!? I belive that providing a layer that facilitates the use of a physics engine would give users an additional reason to use OSG for any simulation. Sukender PVLE - Lightweight cross-platform game engine - http://pvle.sourceforge.net/ > I'm using PAL for a physics integration with delta3d. I'm still confused > about why people want to integrate things like physics and audio into a > scene graph, but that aside, I am adding features and such to PAL since > I have commit access. > > We should all work together implementing features in PAL so we don't > duplicate effort. > > I'm going to be working on adding support for collision masks, then > I'm going to look at doing a character model interface. > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
