On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Jose Luis Hidalgo <
joseluis.hida...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tim,
>
> >>   o What is the situation with importing histories from svn?
> >>
> > Speaking for git, the "git svn" works very well for maintaining a local
> git
> > repository that corresponds to a remote SVN repository. If you ever
> decided
> > that you wanted to "flip the switch," this git repository could be
> uploaded,
> > massaged a bit and become the official git repo.
>
> That's partially true,but there ar some kind of git merges that can
> not be in sync properly with SVN, I've suffered this in the past
> trying to maintain a subversion repository at the same time that a
> local git repository, even working alone I managed to break the local
> git repository and mess some commits over subversion... so, If we move
> to mercurial/git there is no turn back, no retro-compatibility at all.
>
True, and that's the reason for many of the subcommands of "git svn": do
commits, merges etc. in a way that can still be checked back into svn.
However, I believe Robert's question was just about import i.e., no turning
back :)

>
> About importing the history, both git and mercurial can import
> subversion history.
>
> Tim
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to