On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Jose Luis Hidalgo < joseluis.hida...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tim, > > >> o What is the situation with importing histories from svn? > >> > > Speaking for git, the "git svn" works very well for maintaining a local > git > > repository that corresponds to a remote SVN repository. If you ever > decided > > that you wanted to "flip the switch," this git repository could be > uploaded, > > massaged a bit and become the official git repo. > > That's partially true,but there ar some kind of git merges that can > not be in sync properly with SVN, I've suffered this in the past > trying to maintain a subversion repository at the same time that a > local git repository, even working alone I managed to break the local > git repository and mess some commits over subversion... so, If we move > to mercurial/git there is no turn back, no retro-compatibility at all. > True, and that's the reason for many of the subcommands of "git svn": do commits, merges etc. in a way that can still be checked back into svn. However, I believe Robert's question was just about import i.e., no turning back :) > > About importing the history, both git and mercurial can import > subversion history. > > Tim
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org