On Sep 1, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Charles Bennett wrote:

>
> On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Jared ''Danger'' Earle wrote:
>
>> On 1 Sep 2009, at 20:12, Charles Bennett wrote:
>>> 46 Senators are eligible.  None participate.
>>
>>> looks like about 100 Reps are eligible.  None participate.
>>
>> None? I read that as most of them get Federal healthcare. Am I  
>> reading
>> it wrong?
>
>
> The point was that no eligible congress people use *medicare* even
> though they could choose to. (those born in 1944 and earlier)
>
> They have a very nice plan, pretty well administered too.
>
>  It has  a bunch of options so they don't have to go wait with the
> unwashed masses

Well yeah they gave themselves a nice health plan.  Why should they  
change if the plan they have (already gov't run) works really well for  
them.  I am for a public option, but that doesn't mean I'd  
automatically take it just because it is there.

>
> <http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-06-23-congress-benefits_N.htm
>>
>
> The fact is that they intend to EXEMPT themselves from anything they
> pass.
>
> They already exempt themselves from most laws, including minimum  
> wage..
>

Errr, wouldn't that mean they make less than minimum wage?  This law  
sets base wages not maximum wages.  It's called MINIMUM wage, not  
maximum wage.

> besides their plans they ALSO can choose to use the military  
> hospitals.
>
> "Lawmakers can also utilize taxpayer-subsidized care at Walter Reed
> Army Medical Center in Washington and the National Naval Medical
> Center in Bethesda, Md. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.,
> had bypass surgery at Bethesda in 2003. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz,
> D-Fla., battled cancer last year with treatments received at both
> sites."
>
> (that's a freebie for them, BTW)
>
> So..   I guess they are a little more equal than the rest of us.
>


What does this have to do with health care reform and a public  
option?  I don't see the connection beyond an attempt to cloud the  
issue to make it seem like some nefarious plan.  They want a public  
insurance option in addition to private ones.  How is this so horrible  
and bad?  This is not a single payer system.

--Larry
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/

Reply via email to